<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using a public Wave to engage a news audience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2010/01/07/using-a-public-wave-to-engage-a-news-audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2010/01/07/using-a-public-wave-to-engage-a-news-audience/</link>
	<description>How to survive and thrive in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:29:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cyberdoyle</title>
		<link>http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2010/01/07/using-a-public-wave-to-engage-a-news-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-17058</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberdoyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalism20.com/blog/?p=920#comment-17058</guid>
		<description>Great use of the wave.
There is so much potential, but only criticsm is that on big waves with high input and many surfing it gets extremely sluggish. I don&#039;t know if it is a server issue or the limited bandwidth available in the uk, but until it is sorted it will be a while before it is widely used here...
... but its a shame, cos it is a fantastic tool for engagement and collaboration.
chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great use of the wave.<br />
There is so much potential, but only criticsm is that on big waves with high input and many surfing it gets extremely sluggish. I don&#8217;t know if it is a server issue or the limited bandwidth available in the uk, but until it is sorted it will be a while before it is widely used here&#8230;<br />
&#8230; but its a shame, cos it is a fantastic tool for engagement and collaboration.<br />
chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgertor</title>
		<link>http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2010/01/07/using-a-public-wave-to-engage-a-news-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-16399</link>
		<dc:creator>edgertor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalism20.com/blog/?p=920#comment-16399</guid>
		<description>we&#039;re not a newsroom (and i have a google wave acct already), but we might be able to use this to replace teleconferences with journalists on particular issues...i think having a &#039;discussion&#039; that isn&#039;t strictly linear might be advantageous. 

so this is from the other side of the fence, journalism-wise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;re not a newsroom (and i have a google wave acct already), but we might be able to use this to replace teleconferences with journalists on particular issues&#8230;i think having a &#8216;discussion&#8217; that isn&#8217;t strictly linear might be advantageous. </p>
<p>so this is from the other side of the fence, journalism-wise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
