<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard work isn&#8217;t enough: It&#8217;s time to pay attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2009/01/24/hard-work-isnt-enough-its-time-to-pay-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2009/01/24/hard-work-isnt-enough-its-time-to-pay-attention/</link>
	<description>How to survive and thrive in the digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:29:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.journalism20.com/blog/2009/01/24/hard-work-isnt-enough-its-time-to-pay-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journalism20.com/blog/?p=246#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Interesting post - it&#039;s indeed hard to pay attention to one thing at a time with so many competing demands. Online editor-ish types know that every person in the newsroom (let alone the revenue side of the building) has a concern, a project, a suggestion, or a technical stumbling point or an education that needs an instructor. Every story needs another element. Every commenter is testing his/her limits and should get some feedback. Every meeting should have an online discussion point. And since you&#039;re competing for every other internet surfer&#039;s attention, are you actually paying close attention to your world if you&#039;re not twittering, facebooking, digging and stumbling? And if you&#039;re not in all those places, how do you control the attention of those you&#039;re trying to reach. It&#039;s possible that &quot;control of attention&quot; is hard work.

(whoops, back to my regularly scheduled Saturday morning, this happened to catch my attention)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Interesting post &#8211; it&#8217;s indeed hard to pay attention to one thing at a time with so many competing demands. Online editor-ish types know that every person in the newsroom (let alone the revenue side of the building) has a concern, a project, a suggestion, or a technical stumbling point or an education that needs an instructor. Every story needs another element. Every commenter is testing his/her limits and should get some feedback. Every meeting should have an online discussion point. And since you&#8217;re competing for every other internet surfer&#8217;s attention, are you actually paying close attention to your world if you&#8217;re not twittering, facebooking, digging and stumbling? And if you&#8217;re not in all those places, how do you control the attention of those you&#8217;re trying to reach. It&#8217;s possible that &#8220;control of attention&#8221; is hard work.</p>
<p>(whoops, back to my regularly scheduled Saturday morning, this happened to catch my attention)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
